Yearnings and Prospects for Peace in the Holy Land

The Holy Land is valued, treasured, revered and loved by Jews, Christians, and Muslims alike because it is the place where their most treasured spiritual and historical sites and shrines are kept and revered. The fact that the Holy Land, which is located in what is now the state of Israel and the Palestinian lands, is commonly treasured and revered by Jews, Christians, and Muslims alike points out to the common heritage and spiritual unity of these three religions. It is imperative to have peace in the Holy Land for two important reasons:  to allow constructive living to flourish between the Israelis and the Arabs; and to make the Holy Land a zone of peace owing to the fact that it is considered sacred by billions of people in the world and is a site of annual pilgrimages by peoples from different parts of the world.

With the news of bitter conflict between the Israelis and the Palestinian Arabs, what are the prospects for peace in the Holy Land? Is peace achievable after more than 60 years of Arab-Israeli conflict, particularly between the Palestinian Arabs and the Israelis? It is essential to lay down the argument that the violent conflict between Arabs and Israelis needs to be avoided and stopped through their common practice of ethical and spiritual values towards one another and by considering the common heritage of the three religions (Judaism, Islam, and Christianity), based as they all are in the Abrahamic faith tradition and the books of the Old Testament with the lives of the Hebrew patriarchs and other figures. This is similar to the argument of Dr. Omer Salem of the Ibn Rushd Institute for Dialogue that the Islamic moral values can establish peace and justice for the Arabs and Jews in the Arab-Israeli conflict.¹

Maulana Wahiddudin Khan (2008), a well-known Islamic teacher and Sufi spiritual master in India who wrote books about the ideology of peace and Islam, wrote on how to establish peace in the Holy Land by arguing that war is costlier than any other course of action and unequivocally said that the Arabs must accept Israel as a legitimate state by totally abandoning violence against the latter, and that Israel must make territorial adjustment as is acceptable to the Arabs. He further said that the violent course of action adopted by the Arab leaders against Israel is a violation of Islamic principle, which is for reconciliation as the best option by having peaceful negotiations with the other party. This was shown in the life of Muhammad when he signed the treaty of Hudaybiya with his opponents to avoid war and by verses from the Qur’an which speaks of doing a good deed in return for a bad deed to make one’s enemy a potential friend.

Since Arabs, Jews, and Christians are really of one source in terms of patrilineal ancestry and share a common heritage in their faith traditions (Abrahamic faith and lineage), it is wrong for brothers to kill their fellow brothers. Muslims, the same with Christians, trace their spiritual roots to the Hebrew writings of the Old Testament, to Hebrew traditions, personalities and stories. The Jews who have been persecuted by their host countries in their diaspora and who opted to return to their ancient homeland need to accepted by their Arab neighbors by virtue of their being the keepers of the source of the faith traditions of Christianity and Islam. However, in asserting their right for a homeland of their own where they will not be driven out, discriminated, persecuted and killed, they should not evict the Arabs who have made their homes in the Holy Land lest they do what they don’t want done to them.

The Arab-Israeli conflict began with the Arabs’ disapproval of the British partition of the Holy land between the Arabs and the Jews in the Balfour Plan in 1948. Militant groups like the Hamas and Hezbollah arose due to the bitter wars that have been fought between the Israelis and the Arabs (1948 war for independence, 1967 6-day war, and recent exchange of bombings between Hamas and the Israeli Defense Forces). Both the Arabs and the Israelis need to realize that violent attacks and retaliations against each other are totally against the spiritual values taught by their own religion or by the three major religions such as love, magnanimity, compassion, forgiveness, respect for each other’s dignity, and peace.

The win/win solution is to let the humane and spiritual values of love, acceptance, understanding, respect, and generosity to rule between and among Jews and Arabs. In this conflict, Israel should not apply a colonialist, aggressive stance but remember to exercise humaneness and justice to the Palestinians. It is definitely wrong and unjust for them to disregard the basic rights of the Palestinians to life and basic necessities, particularly those in the Gaza Strip. Israelis should respect the rights of the Palestinians to a place in the Holy Land by either giving them equal civil rights under the Israeli government or a full enjoyment of Palestinian statehood. On the side of the Palestinians and all other Arabs in the Middle East, they need to recognize the statehood of Israel and show magnanimity and compassion to a persecuted people by allowing them the right to the Holy Land which was their ancient homeland.

Thus, the application of humane and spiritual values of understanding, love, tolerance, and sharing of land and resources is the better course of action rather than a colonialist stance, firing rockets, suicide bombings, and murderous hatred. Dr. Omer Salem of the Ibn Rushd Institute for Dialogue wrote that the Islamic value of rahma, which is usually translated as “mercy, grace, or compassion”, is advocated in the Qur’an in no less than 400 places, and it is the attribute God chose to describe Himself similar to the God of never failing compassion in the books of the Old Testament. Both the Jews and Muslims should be able to show mercy and compassion towards one another, following the spiritual and ethical values taught by their religions. A sharing of the Holy Land among Jews, Arabs, and Christians follows the law of nature since they have a common spiritual heritage and a common patrilineal ancestry.

More Important Points to Solve the Arab-Israeli Conflict

Various peace initiatives had been undertaken since 1967 to the present to resolve the Arab-Israeli conflict but these were unsuccessful in bringing about a definitive peace in the Holy Land. The root causes for the failure of these peace initiatives are the failure to agree on the terms and conditions of peace and the existence of militant groups such as the Hamas of Palestine and the Hezbollah of Lebanon which resort to violence and trains suicide bombers to show their disapproval of the state of Israel and their hatred for them. A mutually agreeable pact on land territories or partition is imperative, which will entail making some concessions on both sides for the sake of peace. The Arabs should not make unreasonable demands, and the Israelis should be able to make the necessary concessions.

Maulana Wahiddudin Khan (2008) spoke and wrote that the Qur’an advocates seeking a common ground between the Arabs and Jews, and that this can be found in both the secular and religious fields. The common religious ground has been well-explained in the previous paragraphs. In the secular field, Arabs and Jews can work together in the fields of agriculture, horticulture, trade relations, education, etc. There is so much that can be achieved through good will and cooperation whereas hatred and war only leads to destruction, enmity, and death. Arabs and Jews can also adopt a system of power-sharing in this age of democracy by becoming political partners, rather than antagonists.

Dr. Omer Salem (2012) of the Ibn Rushd Institute for Dialogue laid down important points to solve the conflict such as the argument that Jews, Muslims, and Christians must acknowledge their common heritage and unity; confirming that the conflict is part nationalistic and part religious; resolving the religious dispute through the exercise of shared moral values and sense of respect for each other; and affecting a new partition plan for Palestine – one for Arabs and one for the Jews – neither of whom will be called Palestine but Holy Land. The partition will be the Northern State of Holy Land with Jewish majority population and a minority of Arabs, while the Southern State of Holy Land will have Arab majority population with a Jewish minority. He advocated for the granting of citizenship to Palestinian refugees in the countries where they were born or currently reside to defuse the tension caused by the Palestinian refugee problem. For the small minority of Palestinians who refuse to be naturalized in their country of birth or residency, they would be offered citizenship in the Northern State of Holy Land or the Southern State of Holy Land.

Conclusion

On a realistic note, with President Netanyahu’s explicit disapproval for a Palestinian state and the prevailing animosity and hatred between Israelis and the Palestinians, the prospects for peace in the Holy Land are not so optimistic. To arrive at peace, it is necessary to get rid of state and ideological violence by Israelis and Arabs because this will only lead to mutual destruction and death. Overall, there is an urgent need to practice the shared ethical and spiritual values of magnanimity, mercy, compassion, tolerance, respect, forgiveness, etc. for peace and constructive living to flourish among the Arabs and the Jews, as what is beautifully expressed in the words of Maulana Wahiddudin Khan, “to live, and let live”.

End Notes:
1.Paper entitled “The Struggle of Palestine between the Holy Bible and the Holy Qur’an” (2012), Ibn Rushd Institute for Dialogue.
2.Paper presented in a peace conference at the Peres Center for Peace, Tel Aviv, on October 28, 2008. The title of the paper was “How to Establish Peace in the Holy Land: Ten Point Program”.

About the author: Belinda F. Espiritu is a faculty member of the University of the Philippines Cebu. She holds a Master’s degree in Comparative Literature and a PhD degree in Communication. She would like to hear from the readers about their feedback or comments on her articles through her email address: belinda.espiritu@gmail.com to set a conversation going even after her articles have been published.