Opinions
What’s Social Distancing?
In a crisis—especially a pandemic—everything is urgent. It is vital to use simple words that can readily be understood by everyone. Euphemisms such as “social distancing” are for ordinary times. From explaining the phrase to finally understanding it, many lives could have already been lost.
Social distancing, in essence, means: not seeing anybody anymore; breaking up friendships; not having anything to do with some people; reducing one’s social obligations; being a recluse; praying alone instead of praying with faith brethren, etc.
Why can’t we use “physical distancing” instead? I asked myself from the very beginning because that was what we wanted people to do—stay physically far away from each other to avoid contamination. Physical distancing can be easily understood by anyone—regardless of age or educational attainment.
I thought I was alone in this “nit-picking” until I read an article that said, “Experts prefer ‘physical distancing,’ and the WHO agrees.”
Daniel Aldrich, a professor of political science and public policy at Northeastern University, is concerned that the term could be counterproductive. He explained that it is misleading, because the pandemic should encourage strengthening social ties while maintaining physical distancing.
He gave as an example, “People running errands for elderly neighbors practice social connectedness with physical distance.”
Indeed, social ties (not distances) can get us through any kind of trouble. We create all kinds of support groups for various medical and societal problems, don’t we?
In The Washington Post, I read that WHO has started using the term “physical distancing.” The organization wants people—even if they are far apart physically—to still remain connected.
Social connections are necessary to heal and recover. It’s like sharing the grace that we receive instead of hogging it all to ourselves.
“So encourage each other and build each other up . . .” 1 Thessalonians 5:11 (NLT)
